<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Local Rural Access Must Be Part of Value Based Purchasing Reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ruraladvocate.org/2009/08/local-rural-access-must-be-part-of-value-based-purchasing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ruraladvocate.org/2009/08/local-rural-access-must-be-part-of-value-based-purchasing/</link>
	<description>Rural health as it is and we hope it to be</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 22:35:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brock Slabach</title>
		<link>http://www.ruraladvocate.org/2009/08/local-rural-access-must-be-part-of-value-based-purchasing/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Brock Slabach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruraladvocate.org/?p=113#comment-166</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting to note that the existing reform proposals do little to control costs (at least meaningfully), which means that can will be kicked down the road for another day. You&#039;re exactly right, a proactive rural advoacy position while we wait for the other shoe to drop (cost controls) is precisely what we need!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting to note that the existing reform proposals do little to control costs (at least meaningfully), which means that can will be kicked down the road for another day. You&#8217;re exactly right, a proactive rural advoacy position while we wait for the other shoe to drop (cost controls) is precisely what we need!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
